Poll Results
No votes. Be the first one to vote.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
b
Explanation: The flux density of any field is independent of the position (point). D = σ/2 =
2 X 10-6
(-az)/2 = -10
To determine the electric flux density (mathbf{D}) at point (P(1,1,1)) due to a uniform surface charge density (sigma = 2 , mu C/m^2) located at the plane (z = 2), we can refer to Gauss’s law in differential form:
[
nabla cdot mathbf{D} = rho_v
]
However, to apply Gauss’s law directly in this context, it’s easier to consider its integral form, especially since we are dealing with a surface charge in a specific location:
[
oint_S mathbf{D} cdot dmathbf{A} = Q_{enc}
]
Where (oint_S mathbf{D} cdot dmathbf{A}) is the electric flux through a closed surface (S) and (Q_{enc}) is the total charge enclosed by that surface. Since the point of interest (P) is not enclosed by the charged surface and the charge distribution lies entirely in a plane at (z=2), the scenario simplifies the analysis.
For an infinite plane with surface charge density (sigma), the electric field (E) (and thus, the flux density (mathbf{D})) is constant and perpendicular to the surface. By symmetry, above and below the plane, the electric field points away or towards the plane for positive