Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
To decode the words, we analyze the given examples:
1. PLIERS is coded as MMAFJO:
– P -> M (shift of -3)
– L -> M (shift of +1)
– I -> A (shift of -8)
– E -> F (shift of +1)
– R -> J (shift of -2)
– S -> O (shift of -4)
2. SHOVEL is coded as FZRLFR:
– S -> F (shift of -13)
– H -> Z (shift of -2)
– O -> R (shift of -3)
– V -> L (shift of -10)
– E -> F (shift of +1)
– L -> R (shift of +6)
The shifts are not consistent, but we can apply similar transformations if we analyze the letter-to-letter shifts.
Now, let’s code WRENCH using a trial approach based on observed patterns:
Starting with WRENCH:
1. W (position 23) could be coded through a relationship derived from previous shifts. Using a similar pattern like the first transformation:
– From W, let’s say the shift could be -3 instead of -1 (as in PLIERS), yielding:
– W -> T
2. R (position 18):
– R coded with a consistent pattern again: