Poll Results
No votes. Be the first one to vote.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The best number of secondary turns in a current transformer (CT) cannot be defined as a fixed value without specific context or parameters of a given application. The appropriate number of turns on the secondary side of a current transformer depends on various factors including the primary current rating, the secondary current rating (usually standardized to 5A or 1A in many applications), the intended use or application of the CT, the accuracy requirements, and the physical size limitations.
In design terms, the relationship between primary ((N_p)) and secondary ((N_s)) turns in a current transformer can be expressed as:
[
frac{N_p}{N_s} = frac{I_s}{I_p}
]
Where:
– (N_p) is the number of primary turns,
– (N_s) is the number of secondary turns,
– (I_p) is the primary current, and
– (I_s) is the secondary current.
Typically, for most current transformers used in metering or protective relays in electrical power systems, the secondary current is standardized to 5A or 1A. This standardization allows for safer, easier measurements and compatibility across different devices and systems. The actual number of secondary turns is selected to ensure that when the primary current flows, the desired standardized secondary current is induced.
Choosing the right amount of secondary turns involves balancing accuracy, the transformer’s physical size, saturation characteristics, and the burden (the load imposed on the secondary
c
Explanation: The best number of secondary turns of the current transformer is 1 or 2
less than the number such that the turns ratio is equal to the nominal current ratio. For
example in a 1000/5 current transformer, the secondary turns number would be 198 or
199 rather than 200